Gallagher, et al. v. Bayer AG, et al., No. 3:14-cv-04601-WHO Northern District of California Class: All persons in California, New York and Florida who purchased Bayer One A Day supplements that contained one or more claims of heart, immunity or energy benefits Attorneys: Robert N. KaplanRKaplan@kaplanfox.comLaurence D. KingLKing@kaplanfox.comLinda M. Fong Kaplan Fox seeks declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief related to Bayer’s practice of claiming “heart health,” “immunity support” and “energy” benefits related to its line of One A Day vitamin supplements. The amended class complaint alleges that these claims are unsupported by science and mislead consumers as to the actual benefits of these products. On March 10, 2015, the Northern District of California denied in part Bayer’s motion to dismiss, allowing the case to proceed. On November 16, 2017, after extensive expert and fact discovery, the Court denied Bayer’s motion for summary judgement, and certified three classes of consumers in California, New York and Florida. The option was temporarily sealed pending redactions, and was reported by Law 360 here. Amended Class Action Complaint Order Denying Motion to Dismiss Connect with Kaplan Fox. Receive a complimentary case review now. Contact Us Inari Medical, Inc. See the Case Barclays iPath Series B S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN See the Case Charles River Laboratories International, Inc. See the Case Digital Currency Group, Inc. See the Case Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. See the Case Co-Diagnostics, Inc. See the Case Vale SA See the Case Geron Corporation See the Case Hecla Mining Company See the Case Textron Inc. See the Case Ambac Financial Group Securities Litigation See the Case Citigroup CSO Hedge Fund Class Action See the Case
